The No.1 i-Technology Magazine in the World !
   
 

      ES no BS
This is a personal blog of Yakov Fain       My son's animations and music         No BS IT podcast      Америчка




Archives

««Aug 2010»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

RSS Feed








Subscribe to these blogs

Mac or PC, RIA with Adobe or Microsoft?

posted Tuesday, 30 January 2007

My Dell laptop is dying and I had to make a choice -  which small screen laptop tp buy next. After having two issues with motherboards Dell is out, and I was choosing between Lenovo X60 (12") and MacBook Pro (13") with  dual boot - OSX or Windows. As a professional enterprise developer I was inclined to stay with PC, and these couple of youtube videos have confirmed my decision - Wintel notebook.

But I'm still waiting till Lenovo will start shipping their notebooks with Windows Vista (today's the first official Vista day). That's why I decided to look at the Windows Vista home page .  It shows a nice little presentation on  Vista using...Flash Player from their rival Adobe. This is a clear indication that Flash Player is a de-facto standard when it comes to delivering multimedia.  FLash Player's ubiquity forced Microsoft bite the bullet and use it instead of their Windows Media Player.That's why Adobe Flex and not WPF/E is a tool of choice for rich internet application development...at least for another couple of years.

tags:            

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    




1. Murat left...
Wednesday, 31 January 2007 4:31 am

Nice point, I wonder why microsoft doesn't build a flash clone since that has been their primary strategy for ages. If there is a nice sucessfull product build a clone! If microsoft can not control a tecnology they build a clone and gave full support to their product, like developing their own java which later anded up building of .net when sun did not let microsoft to control java. Neither active x controls or media player can deliver multimedia like flash does. So ; 1. they might not interested in delivering multimedia (I dont believe this, they are producing mouse, keyboard and even webcams!. Any product related with computers are their interest), 2. flash might be so de-facto standart that even microsoft doea not want that challange (come on they are even trying to challange with playstation with a pc based box) 3. they might think their products have equal functionality (they may be but they are still using flash instead) 4. they are already building the clone (??)


2. Yakov Fain left...
Wednesday, 31 January 2007 6:22 am

For many years MS was in a position "We have more than enough customers that do Windows only". This strategy was working for them in traditionally MS IT shops, and on the Web it was also fine because plain HTML Web pages did not care if the back end was programmed in ASP or JSP. They were fine even with AJAX, because Microsoft was the company that introduced XMLHTTPRequest object back in 1999 in IE5. Now all of a sudden, people need rich media delivered over the Web, and guess what, some of the use Linux, Unix, OSX, etc. MS needs to reach as many people as possible but Window Media Player is not capable of doing so. Thats why Flash Player came into picture. But MS is changing the strategy here and WPF/E (Windows Presentation Foundation Everywhere) should be available for RIA on multiple platforms, but it takes time...


3. Murat left...
Wednesday, 31 January 2007 7:36 am

So they are already building the clone :)))


4. Yakov Fain left...
Friday, 2 February 2007 1:03 pm

After all, I've ordered Toshiba SATELLITE U200,12" monitor, 4LB, INTEL CORE 2 DUO, 1.66GHZ, 2GB RAM, 60GB hard disk, CD-RW/DVD for $1268 USD. I decided to stay with Windows XP - do not want to deal with issues like printer driver does not exist for Vista. Lenovo X60 of the same configuration would cost another $400 or more.